What comparisons does Stevenson make between different types of sentencing?

Bryan Stevenson highlights the disparities in the criminal justice system, particularly focusing on how socioeconomic status can influence sentencing outcomes. By comparing wealthy offenders to poor individuals, he illustrates a fundamental inequity: those with financial means often have access to better legal representation, resources, and alternative sentencing options. This can lead to lesser sentences or more lenient treatment compared to individuals who cannot afford quality legal defense, who may face harsher penalties.

In the context of Stevenson's work, this comparison underscores the broader systemic issues present within the justice system, such as class bias and the impact of poverty on legal outcomes. Stevenson advocates for a more equitable system, emphasizing that justice should not be determined by socioeconomic status but should be equally applied to all individuals, regardless of their financial situation.